|
I recently bought several old ballet books at the Abandoned Planet bookstore in San Francisco (my favorite bookstore because of the store's two cats, one of which is an Abyssinian).<P>"Fonteyn, Impressions of a Ballerina" (1952) by former Royal Ballet designer William Chappell, is chock full of photographs by Cecil Beaton. I haven't started reading it yet, but the photographs, most of which are new to me, are wonderul. The camera certainly loved this woman.<P>Another book, which I have started reading, is "Ballet Technique" (1956) by Tamara Karsavina. There's a beautiful photo portrait of her in evening dress. I can't see enough of the dress to guess the date, but her hair is silvery, and she looks very beautiful and glamorous. The other photographs in the book are primarily of Royal Ballet dancers. Beriosova is used to demonstrate points Karsavina makes in the text.<P>I thought Karsavina's comments on how the nature of "Giselle" has changed are interesting.<P> <BLOCKQUOTE><font size="1" face="Verdana, Arial">quote:</font><HR>The fairly accurate revival of Coralli's masterpiece, well done as it is, yet has lost much of its original style. It took me some time to puzzle out why the same choreography, the same set of steps, are not the same any more in their effect and in their emotional value. It is because the choreography of <I>Giselle</I> has been transposed into another key. Originally composed for a dancer of exceptional lightness, it was in my time reserved for ballerinas with more than average elevation. This seems to be no longer so. Bringing <I>Giselle</I> down to the level of any technically accomplished dancer meant a sacrifice of its sublime feature, its spiritualised lightness. <I>Giselle</I> does not easily adapt itself to the means of a <I>terre à terre</I> dancer. In order to make such an adaptation many rhythms have to be quickened.<HR></BLOCKQUOTE><P>It seems to me that this must be so even more today, when the fashion in ballerinas seems to be turning toward the exceptionally flexible body with very arched feet and very hyperextended legs. This type of dancer is seldom known for elevation. When I saw SFB's "Giselle," I thought the ballerina who was best suited, technically, to the part was Tina LeBlanc. This was partly because of her high, light jumps, but also because her pointe work looks so lifted out of her feet that it reminds me of the original idea of pointe work, i.e., the dancer is so ethereal that she's ready to float right off the floor.<p>[This message has been edited by djb (edited April 21, 2002).]
|