public forum
home forum magazine gallery links about faq courtesy
It is currently Sat Oct 25, 2014 12:28 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Moscow Stanislavsky Ballet in London (Petit's Coppelia)
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 5:57 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2001 11:01 pm
Posts: 711
Location: Rugby, UK / Taipei
The Moscow Stanislavsky Ballet debuts Coppélia

Yes, yet another visiting ballet company in London this summer.

This time it is the Moscow Stanislavsky Ballet, who are bringing Roland Petit's "Coppelia" to the London Coliseum from July 11 to 14.

Perhaps the biggest attraction for balletgoers, assuming he turns up, is that the casting includes Sergei Polunin. Also appearing will be Semyon Velichko, Kristina Shapran and Erika Mikirticheva.

At a press conference today, Polunin put his sudden absence in April down to "health issues" but that the was "delighted to have another opportunity to dance at the Coliseum in July. Coppélia is one of my favourite ballets and I will be there!"

Casting (subject to change):
11 July (eve): Sergei Polunin, Kristina Shapran
12 July (mat): Dmitry Sobolevsky, Natalia Somova
12 July (eve): Semyon Velichko, Erika Mikirticheva
13 July (mat): Sergei Polunin, Kristina Shapran
13 July (eve): Semyon Velichko, Natalia Somova
14 July (mat): Sergei Polunin, Erika Mikirticheva

Evening performances 7.30pm
Sat matinee 2.30pm
Sun Matinee 2pm

Tickets £5-£85
Box office: 020 7845 9300 or http://www.eno.org


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moscow Stanislavsky Ballet in London (Petit's Coppelia)
PostPosted: Tue May 28, 2013 7:36 pm 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2000 12:01 am
Posts: 12415
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Previews of the Stanislavsky Ballet's performances of Roland Petit's "Coppelia."

Louise Jury of the Evening Standard.

Evening Standard

Mark Brown for the Guardian.

Guardian

Nick Clark for the Independent.

Independent

Rosa Silverman for the Telegraph.

Telegraph


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moscow Stanislavsky Ballet in London (Petit's Coppelia)
PostPosted: Fri Jul 12, 2013 10:07 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2000 12:01 am
Posts: 12415
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Ismene Brown reviews the July 11, 2013 performance of Roland Petit's "Coppelia" at the London Coliseum for the Arts Desk.

Arts Desk

Rachel Ward reviews the same performance for the Telegraph.

Telegraph


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moscow Stanislavsky Ballet in London (Petit's Coppelia)
PostPosted: Sat Jul 13, 2013 10:54 am 
Offline

Joined: Tue Jan 04, 2000 12:01 am
Posts: 12415
Location: Seattle, WA, USA
Sam Smith reviews "Coppelia" for Londonist.

Londonist


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moscow Stanislavsky Ballet in London (Petit's Coppelia)
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 4:38 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2001 11:01 pm
Posts: 711
Location: Rugby, UK / Taipei
Coppélia
Moscow Stanislavsky Ballet
London Coliseum; July 12, 2013

Jessica Wright

Attachment:
The Stanislavsky Ballet in Coppelia. Photo Stanislavsky Ballet.jpg
The Stanislavsky Ballet in Coppelia. Photo Stanislavsky Ballet.jpg [ 29.84 KiB | Viewed 2311 times ]

In London for four nights only, the Moscow Stanislavsky Ballet’s presentation of Roland Petit’s Coppélia relied much on the pull of Sergei Polunin. On this evening, though, Franz was danced by Dmitry Sobolevsky, who as a character fell behind both the energetic corps and Anton Domashev’s excellent Dr. Coppélius, despite finding fantastic height in his jetés and easily securing his double tours.

Set in a garrison town, Petit’s “Coppélia” offers a fairly modern take on a true classic, while still injecting bursts of humour into the choreography and evoking a sense of intrigue regarding the nature of Dr Coppélius’ intent. Despite this, much of the action appeared too staged and there was a lack of personal engagement with the plot by the dancers. The technique presented was flawless and the classical performances rousing enough, but there did not appear to be much naturalism or sense of ease from the ultimately ‘Barbie and Ken’ leads. Natalia Somova in particular was rather wooden in her approach to the dual role of Swanhilda/doll. Her fixed expression became rather tedious and uninspiring although she certainly showed nimble feet and elastic legs.

Whilst not unenjoyable, this version dismisses much of Act 3 from the proceedings and does not present some of the moments usually considered integral to the plot. The Ear of Corn pas de deux, for example, is glazed over without any corn, the chosen movement unfortunately ignoring some of the most poignant and telling parts of the score, not least where Swanhilda discovers Franz does not love her. Whilst by now Sobolevsky and Somova’s performance was a little more heartfelt than previously, it only hinted at the ructions in the relationship.

The presence of the corps and Dr Coppélius prevented the work from disappearing completely, however. Domashev truly commanded Act 2, leading the audience into his dinner date with Coppélia; a far cry from his usual unnerving loneliness which is often conveyed in other version. As a suave and slicked-back gentleman, his pre-dinner dance with his doll was an entertaining and effective comic ‘pas de deux.’ Rather like a ventriloquist and his puppet, he was grand in his theatrical gestures and rather likeable, even turning his disagreement with Franz in into a satisfying duet of mini-drama with witty consequence. As convincing as his characterisation and enthusiasm was though, the question as to why he made his doll remained unanswered.

The corps (soldiers and their ladies rather than villagers) were very convincing, providing some much needed life and enthusiastic relief into the lethargic Act 1. They were a stark contrast to Swanhilda and her simplistic, baby-faced and rather twee girlfriends. They showed individuality, which was a refreshing wash of narrative illusion from the largely technical and unconvincing one given by Franz and Swanhilda. The Mazurka and Czardas were filled with enthusiastic heel clips, humour and character. The dancers’ lively portrayals brought the stage to life. Living up to their lead, the male members of the corps executed clean double tours simultaneously.

Elsewhere in Act 2, Sobolevsky became much more watchable and passionate; a distinct improvement in his seemingly half-heartedness earlier in the evening. He went on to perform his solos with increased enthusiasm and an almost regal command of the stage. He is an excellent turner and there was plenty of elevation in his jetés. Somova’s Spanish and Scottish solos managed to look flashy and neat without being taxing.

For a Coppélia first timer, Petit’s light-hearted and humorous approach might make an ideal as an introduction to the production. The choreography is a clear step away from that of the classic production, which does bring a different vitality to the work, not least through the lack of predictability of movement, although there is an abundance of rather tiresome cutesy wiggling from Swanhilda and her friends. It’s the gaps in the plot that make it feel unfulfilling. Having said that, the cast embraced the choreography with intent and commitment, and both Sobolevsky and Somova’s performances did lend themselves to the production’s relatively restricted narrative


Last edited by David on Mon Jul 15, 2013 7:18 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Re: Moscow Stanislavsky Ballet in London (Petit's Coppelia)
PostPosted: Mon Jul 15, 2013 4:47 am 
Offline

Joined: Sun Jul 01, 2001 11:01 pm
Posts: 711
Location: Rugby, UK / Taipei
No formal review from me on this one, but I have to say that overall I rather enjoyed the production.

Jessica makes some very valid points re the narrative and the score, and yes, the meaning of Ballad of the Ear of Corn was totally lost, but I will not lament the passing of most of Act 3 (when the usual narrative disappears anyway). I also really liked the setting. Replacing the village with a garrison town, and the villagers with soldiers (Prussian hussars?) worked a treat and brought real vitality to the ensemble dances. It was interesting, though that there was more character in the small vignettes from the soldiers and ladies than there ever was from the two leads.

And forget all the fuss about Polunin. Franz is not actually on stage all that much - and he's asleep some of that time anyway. There's also no big pas de deux as in the 'convential' versions. The real star of the show is the good doctor, and Dmitry Sobolevsky was outstanding. He was a sort of cross between Hercule Poirot and Charlie Chaplin - debonair and suave, but witty and with just a touch of pathos too. The pas de deux with the doll is genius.

I rather liked Petit's movement vocabulary, although, yes, there was rather too much waggling of bottoms. As a production, it is also very pink at times - Swanhilda and her friends all wear pink tutus the whole time. But then it is French I suppose!


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 6 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 2 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
The messages in this forum are posted by members of the general public and do not reflect the opinions or beliefs of CriticalDance or its staff.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group