|
The conductors I have been around (the good ones) check with the soloists to make sure the tempo (tempe?) is good for them - and there are subtle variations as different couples, or people do different roles. Also Artist directors weigh in. I watched the Royal Ballet's performance on PBT ( I was a fiend on the remote, switching between it and the Kennedy Center Honors) and I too found it extremely slow. But on the otherhand, the choreography seemed to warrant the slowness of the music.<P>In my highly uneducated way, I must say, I had a hard time watching the thing, as the music was so slow as to be boring, and I thought the choreography better than a cup of Sleepy Time Herb Tea. But in my mind, I chalked it up to perhaps being what the orginal Nut may have looked like with similar choreography to the original - I even wondered if it wasn't so close to the original, that that is why I noted a few things Balachine may have borrowed from his memories of the Russian. (I didn't find mention in the paper of who the choreographer was - and didn't get tuned in on time to see the opening prior to the appearance of Julie Andrews.)<P>The sets beautiful, the dancers lovely, the costumes lovely (though I was ready to strangle Dros with his cape), the lighting probably lovely onstage but difficult for video (I can forgive this, as I am the queen of darkness) but my overwhelming reaction was to want to grab the baton from the maestro, and after beating him over the head with it - stir things up a little.
|