|
I was a little busy the last days. I hope you agree, when i pick up some of the postings before.<P>Maggie posted January 23:<P>One small addendum to Rabbit's excellent post. Something that was actually touched upon. Much creativity arises when a person is doing "nothing" by most societal standards. The creative process needs room to exist, and with most people being constantly "busy" with constant activity and input, the creative aspect is either forced or unable to come forward at all. <BR>Being busy and having input or stimulus isn't bad, it's just becoming unbalanced. Those times of doing nothing are necessary and doesn't mean nothing is happening. We sometimes feel guilty about it, or conversely, we feel proud about how "busy" we are, and like to "outbusy" others. Our hearts and minds need room to allow things to come to the surface after we have spent time stimulating them with our world and environment.<BR>Yes, Maggie, this is perhaps one of the most important phases in the creative process. Just before the “illumination” we do have a period of doing ”nothing”.<P>The phase before that there is the “incubation”. This is the time where we have the explorations, the rejections, doing it again, changing it, finding new entrances and so on.<P>I’m sure most of us know where I am talking about. (the phase in the beginning is the “preparing” and at the end the “verification” / it’s possible you use other terms, but that’s not so important)<P>For me it’s the question: how much time do we need for the “incubation”? Sometimes it takes 30 minutes, sometimes some days, sometime even longer. But, to call it a creative process you have to go through all the phases. When not it isn’t a creative process.<P>Every class takes 60 – 90 minutes. I doubt if a creative process is possible in a regular class. I’m really sorry, it’s similar, but it’s not a creative process. You just don’t have enough time.<P>Personally I think it’s more a development of the vitality. I’m sure Rabbit, you disagree J<BR>
|