CriticalDance Forum
http://www.ballet-dance.com/forum/

Los Angeles Ballet, 2007-2008
http://www.ballet-dance.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=4&t=30826
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Andre Yew [ Sun Dec 09, 2007 4:10 pm ]
Post subject:  Los Angeles Ballet, 2007-2008

Los Angeles Ballet kicks off its 2007-2008 season with a series of Nutcrackers around Southern California, and this feature on Melissa Barak by the LA Times. I didn't know you could make a decent living in LA with choreography.

Quote:
Naughty & Nice
Elizabeth Khuri, LA Times

L.A.’s dance world, long in need of a marquee-name ballerina, has a new headliner: Melissa Barak. The West Hollywood native, who spent more than nine years with the New York City Ballet, is now bringing her dynamic style to the year-old Los Angeles Ballet as a principal performer and choreographer.
more

Author:  LMCtech [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 12:35 pm ]
Post subject: 

Well, maybe there is hope for La after all.

Are you going to any performance Andrew?

Author:  Andre Yew [ Mon Dec 10, 2007 2:34 pm ]
Post subject: 

Yes, I'm hopefully going to see them at the end of this month. I'll try to catch one performance each of Corina Gill's and Melissa's SPF. I'm more looking forward to their programs this spring with the new choreography and Balanchine.

--Andre

Author:  luvschicago [ Thu Dec 13, 2007 6:00 pm ]
Post subject: 

I think there's room for the classics in L.A. I'd love to think they're hungry for it!

Author:  Andre Yew [ Thu Dec 13, 2007 11:06 pm ]
Post subject: 

I am tempted to think that LA has a fairly unsophisticated dance audience. The one sure thing is that when ABT shows up with a full-length ballet, it will sell out. Big names help, too, but rep programs don't really do that well, which is why it's interesting to see LAB pursue that strategy. Even when NYCB visited a few years ago in a rare visit, many of their shows, which were all mixed rep, were undersold.

On the other hand, I get confused when I see programs like Merce Cunningham and Shen Wei be really popular. I wonder if there is different marketing for these events, because I see a lot more young hipster types at those events than the classical ballet ones. Yet the same theaters are presenting both types of programs.

I get the feeling that the really popular ones are perceived more as an event to be at, than just a dance event. It's like if you're really cool, you'd be at the event, instead of if you're interested in dance you'd be at the event. Does anyone sell some pre-packaged cool we can spray on our events?

--Andre

Author:  luvschicago [ Fri Dec 14, 2007 9:06 am ]
Post subject: 

It makes me wonder if Christoper Wheldon(?) new ballet company would do well. isn't it supposed to be classical meets cool?

Author:  LMCtech [ Fri Dec 14, 2007 12:54 pm ]
Post subject: 

With so many good ballet schools in the Southland, you would hope that some audience members would be there for the dancing.

Author:  Francis Timlin [ Mon Feb 25, 2008 3:27 pm ]
Post subject: 

Lewis Segal reviews LA Ballet's performance of three works by Balanchine ("Four Temperaments," "Tarantella," and "Who Cares?") plus a new work, "Lost in Transition" by Melissa Barak at UCLA's Freud Playhouse (in competition with the Georgian State Ballet at Royce Hall on the same campus!) in the Los Angeles Times:

LA Times

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group
http://www.phpbb.com/