
<P><BR>Whoa... what disparate views from the two SF papers about SFB's Romeo & Juliet.<P>SF Chronicle's Octavia Roca calls it dull:<BR> <A HREF="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/05/01/DD6912.DTL&type=performance" TARGET=_blank>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2000/05/01/DD6912.DTL&type=performance</A> <P><BR>SF Examiner's Allan Ulrich thought it sizzled:<BR> <A HREF="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/examiner/hotnews/stories/01/Sromeo.dtl&type=performance" TARGET=_blank>http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/examiner/hotnews/stories/01/Sromeo.dtl&type=performance</A> <P><BR>Meanwhile, Contra Costa Times' Marilyn Tucker found it emotional:<BR> <A HREF="http://www.hotcoco.com/timeout/stories_feattop/x1ballet_20000501.htm" TARGET=_blank>http://www.hotcoco.com/timeout/stories_feattop/x1ballet_20000501.htm</A>