|
Well, the central question, of course, is:<P> "Is our children learning?"<P>I don't mean this as a partisan slam (well, OK, maybe a <I>little</I>).<P>When I was teaching college, some of my students objected strenuously to the fact that I counted off for spelling errors ("This isn't English class," they'd say, as if the purpose of English class were to teach them to use correct English in English class). The purpose, of course, was to get them to make correct English (those of you from other parts of the world, feel free to mentally substitute your native language for "English". This includes you, Stuart) an intrinsic part of their being, so that the skills would be there automatically when they were needed.<P>As far as I can tell, President Bush is perfectly capable of using the language well, but -- like so many Americans -- never truly assimilated those skills. As a result, when he was under stress he made a basic error that made him appear ignorant and uneducated.<P>College, of course, was really too late to be trying to inculcate these values; they really must be instilled in high school/middle school/grade school. It's the same with art; if they don't learn to appreciate it early in life, the most they can hope for as adults (most of them, anyway) is a surface appreciation. This is why arts education is vital.<BR><p>[This message has been edited by salzberg (edited March 08, 2001).]
_________________ Jeffrey E. Salzberg,
Dance Lighting Design http://www.jeffsalzberg.com
|