|
This is a question for those of you who are experienced in improvisation, either contact improvisation or any other type of improvisation-based dance - for example, people who dance Flamenco Puro can also take a shot at this question. I saw a documentary about the choreographer Akram Khan who uses "islands of improvisation" in some of his choreographies. He said that the first hour of improvisation is basically worthless, because people are just regurgitating what they already know. They are just running through their "inventory" of tried-and-true movements. He claimed that its only after an hour of solid improvisation, when people have gone through their inventory, that the truly exciting movements begin to show up, on the spot. These are movements that the dancers would have never danced had they relied on their inventory. Has anyone here had a similar experience? Does anyone agree with Khan that the truly interesting movements will show up only after an hour of ongoing improvisation? Tex. PS. As for my own experiences, I used to improvise when I went to junior drama school as a kid and I always hated it. I've never had the experience of improvising for a solid hour, let alone for more than an hour. Hence the question. <small>[ 30 August 2004, 02:03 PM: Message edited by: Maria Technosux ]</small>
_________________ "I'm surprised you decided not to pursue what sounds like Linning's politicization of the ballet body."
|