public forum
home forum magazine gallery links about faq courtesy
It is currently Mon Apr 21, 2014 10:55 am

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 
Author Message
 Post subject: Decouflé au Crazy Horse
PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 2:31 am 
Offline

Joined: Thu Dec 29, 2005 3:46 am
Posts: 75
Philippe Decouflé va devenir directeur artistique du Crazy Horse nous dit Le Parisien.


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Wed Nov 12, 2008 4:46 pm 
Offline

Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2003 11:01 pm
Posts: 2323
:shock:


Tant mieux pour le crazy!

_________________
L'art naît de contraintes, vit de luttes et meurt de liberté


Top
 Profile  
 
 Post subject: Birds of a feather
PostPosted: Thu Nov 13, 2008 9:16 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 12:01 am
Posts: 358
Location: Paris
Birds of a Feather, Flock Together.


(I’ve just been eating Oysters by the bye)


Those of you thought that bum-sniffing was confined to the canine species, Think Again! You've not seen Wayne McGregor’s new Opus at Covent Garden, entitled INFRA.

Decuffli's nuffink asides zis.

Cannot quite figure out what the appositely-named Weaker Sex may have done to deserve such treatment by Wayne of the ice-cold, dead eyes.

Gives me the Jeebie-Heebies.

Lady-killer?

But, Thank Heavens for Small Mercies: Wayne's attentions to the Weaker Sex appear to be confined to the stage.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
 Post subject: Et dans la veine Crazy Horse
PostPosted: Wed Nov 26, 2008 2:26 am 
Offline

Joined: Sat Nov 06, 2004 12:01 am
Posts: 358
Location: Paris
Pour ceux qui lisent bien l'anglais, quelques extraits d'une critique hilaire de INFRA à Covent Garden, apparu sur "ballet.co" et signé AlexP (son article est TRES long, j'en donne moins de dix pourcent, donc nous sommes dans la déontologie de l'Internet). Chapeau à AlexP, fort habile - il a réussi à faire publier sa critique, alors que celles de l'auteur de ces lignes ont été, sur un site dont on taira le nom, C..................S.



AlexP

"(///) Put simply, nothing really happened. Vague themes coupled with an over hyped, simplistic and rather laboured visual statement were not enough to make it come to life. (...) The moments of semi-acting (I think the alarming phrase 'emotional content' was used (...) ) looked contrived (...) as if someone had 'had a quiet word' and requested something a bit less cold and machine-like this time (...).

(...) As for the actual music of this piece, it was so disappointingly flat, meagre, unoriginal, lifeless and downright miserable that no choreography could possibly express it (...) The lack of rhythm (...) means the dancers (...) at times end up looking like human metronomes (...) This (lack of) interaction with rhythm (...) is in my opinion why so many modern pieces have dancers who appear angst ridden, miserable, stony faced, pedestrian (...)

McGregor comes across as wanting to be (...) the 'choreographer-intellectual' who can spend a minute talking like an astro-physicist about such (...) obvious givens as that fact that the stage is quite big so the audience can't focus on all of it at the same time (...). Really?! Talking up such waffle as if it were a valid theme-to-be-explored-as-subject-matter is exactly the reason why this piece goes nowhere.

(...) putting aside the earnest, chin rubbing themes as given in interviews and in program notes it's worth remembering that what we are actually being given onstage is a bucket load of impossible extension, rippling torsos, skimpy costumes, catwalk-cool (non) expression and an awful lot of very slinky/ sultry/ sexy moves. Could it be that some of those audience members leaving the ROH with their tongues hanging out repeating things like, "OMG that was amaaaaaaazing" are being just a tiny bit manipulated here?

(...) as McGregor's appointment was, I believe, in part a drive to woo (new, young) audiences it might be worth remembering that glossy coffee table books may be very pick-up-able and easy to drool over (...) but they are also just as (...) quickly forgotten or discarded. I am not sure (...) if the RB really wants new substantial productions (...) and am starting to think maybe the plan is from now on to gradually go 'pop' and only make 'of the moment' disposable works, relying more and more on celebrity buzz, hype, gimmicky audience involvement and relentlessly creative marketing. I really do hope this is not the case.


Top
 Profile E-mail  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 4 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 7 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
The messages in this forum are posted by members of the general public and do not reflect the opinions or beliefs of CriticalDance or its staff.
Powered by phpBB © 2000, 2002, 2005, 2007 phpBB Group